Home > Active* Consent for school communities: overview of the schools programme and research findings.

MacNeela, Padraig and McIvor, Charlotte and Achteresch, Lisa and Bharath, A and Dawson, Kate and Burke, Lorraine and Connolly, Rebecca and D’Eath, Maureen and Foden, Eadaoin and McGrath, Sinead and O’Rourke, Theresa and Tierney, Kate and O'Higgins, S (2021) Active* Consent for school communities: overview of the schools programme and research findings. Galway: NUI Galway.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Active* Consent for school communities)
651kB

External website: https://www.nuigalway.ie/student-life/student-supp...


The report contains the first in-depth research analysis of consent communication among Irish teenagers from a survey of 613 post-primary students. This research explores findings on attitudes to consent, perceptions of peers, and how young people responded to consent communication dilemmas. 

This survey found:

  • 93% of females and 79% of males agreed that consent is always required for sexual activity. (18% of males were neutral as to whether consent is always required; 3% disagreed that it is always required. 6% of females were neutral; 1% disagreed).
  • 62% agreed that consent for this activity always needed to be verbal, and 60% said that non-verbal consent to sexual activity is sometimes OK.
  • 51% agreed that their peers think consent is always required for sexual activity, while 37% agreed that their peers think consent should always be verbal.
  • There was a significant gender gap in personal comfort with being sexually intimate with someone they had just met at a party, with females less likely to be comfortable than males. While 7% of females were comfortable with intimate touching, 51% of males said they were comfortable.
  • There was also a significant gap among females between their personal levels of comfort with being intimate with someone they just met at a party, and how comfortable they thought other teenagers were with it. While 7% of females were comfortable with intimate touching, 42% of females agreed that other teenagers would be comfortable with this.
  • 98% agreed it is okay to say “No, I don’t want to” if you don’t want to have sex.
  • 92% agreed there is a need to talk about sexual consent even in a relationship. Nevertheless, being awkward, embarrassed, or being afraid of being judged or ruining the mood emerged as key barriers to consent communication.
  • The survey participants responded to three “consent stories” that explored reactions to someone saying “no” to a partner, to whether a smile constitutes consent, and to how males are perceived if they turn down sex.

The report completes a two-year process of developing the Active* Consent programme for schools. This complements the work that Active* Consent carries out with colleges and sports organisations. 

P.6 Several contextual factors relevant to consent have been identified and discussed in the literature. These include:

  • The impact of alcohol and drug consumption on capacity alongside false beliefs about the continued ability to give consent and engage in sexual decision-making while under the influence...

Based on the research carried out by Active* Consent, the schools programme launched consists of an integrated package of resources, each of which can also be delivered on a stand-alone basis: 

  • A sexual consent workshop for young people aged 15-17 that can be provided in-class or online.
  • Awareness-raising seminars for parents and guardians, along with education/training resources for teachers.
  • Sex on Our Screens, an eLearning resource designed to increase young people’s critical literacy skills on sexual media, pornography, body image, and consent
  • How I Learned About Consent, a new filmed theatrical drama that explores the nuances of consent, how we learn about consent, and the positive changes that take place when we practice active, positive consent.

Repository Staff Only: item control page